12-17-2014, 02:04 PM
Interesting events on turn 7 between the Swampmen and Urik forces (both hit each other's capitals on the same turn) but your Section 1 messages make more sense when you consider the execution order of the events.
For Swampmen, it says that you liberated your Count from the Urik capital (was a prisoner) when you conquered it but he's not showing up in your emissary section because the Urik group attacked your capital afterwards and recaptured him (all freed prisoners are sent back to your capital). So Section I messages for both of you don't indicate a software problem (of being freed then missing) but rather shows the execution order of the game regarding your two attack orders.
And relocating your capitals was the reason why your rulers couldn't do any sole orders for the turn.
Also affected were your natural enemy's influence which were raised/lowered whenever a capital fell as well as how many emissaries were captured (results in a minor influence loss for your kingdom and a minor gain for your natural enemy).
For Swampmen, it says that you liberated your Count from the Urik capital (was a prisoner) when you conquered it but he's not showing up in your emissary section because the Urik group attacked your capital afterwards and recaptured him (all freed prisoners are sent back to your capital). So Section I messages for both of you don't indicate a software problem (of being freed then missing) but rather shows the execution order of the game regarding your two attack orders.
And relocating your capitals was the reason why your rulers couldn't do any sole orders for the turn.
Also affected were your natural enemy's influence which were raised/lowered whenever a capital fell as well as how many emissaries were captured (results in a minor influence loss for your kingdom and a minor gain for your natural enemy).